7.11.2005

naming terror

Food for thought from Karen Armstrong in today's Guardian ... "The label of Catholic terror was never used about the IRA". Worth the read, but here are some teasers:

We need a phrase that is more exact than "Islamic terror". These acts may be committed by people who call themselves Muslims, but they violate essential Islamic principles. The Qur'an prohibits aggressive warfare, permits war only in self-defence and insists that the true Islamic values are peace, reconciliation and forgiveness. ...

We rarely, if ever, called the IRA bombings "Catholic" terrorism because we knew enough to realise that this was not essentially a religious campaign. Indeed, like the Irish republican movement, many fundamentalist movements worldwide are simply new forms of nationalism in a highly unorthodox religious guise. This is obviously the case with Zionist fundamentalism in Israel and the fervently patriotic Christian right in the US. ...

It is important to know who our enemies are, but equally crucial to know who they are not. It is even more vital to avoid turning potential friends into foes. By making the disciplined effort to name our enemies correctly, we will learn more about them, and come one step nearer, perhaps, to solving the seemingly intractable and increasingly perilous problems of our divided world.

1 comment:

Susan Rose Francois, CSJP said...

Michelle also has a post on this topic on Sollicitudo Rei Socialis

http://socialconcern.blogspot.com/2005/07/reading-guardian-in-dangerous-world.html